Who it’s for
A reviewer in a radio-frequency (SAR) test lab who checks SAR test reports.
A test lab · live
For a reviewer in a radio-frequency (SAR) test lab. Before a report went out, they cross-checked its values against the master test table with Ctrl+F, which took about three days.
Try it once without the table: the Excel checks turn yellow instead of guessing.
Upload one or more SAR report .docx files (each may contain multiple template pages). Tip: you can drop your filled master .xlsx together with the .docx files right here in one go.
| Document | Plots passed | Status | Corrected copy |
|---|
Sample files and values, made up for this page. This is a simulation of the tool’s screens, not the lab’s tool, its reports or its numbers.
Four parts, plainly.
A reviewer in a radio-frequency (SAR) test lab who checks SAR test reports.
They cross-checked report values against the master test table with Ctrl+F, which took about three days.
A local tool that checks SAR report Word documents against the master test table, liquid check files and daily system check plots, and flags every mismatch. The review now takes about thirty minutes.
Live and private: an internal Windows app that runs only on the reviewer’s computer, built during my 2026 summer at UL Solutions. Version 21, the latest, runs 19 checks on every plot page; earlier versions ran 13.
Where it stops.
Honest line: the checker doesn’t approve a report. It flags, and a person still decides. Both times, three days and thirty minutes, are approximate. The story of that summer is on the UL page.